health insurance agent in Isle of Palms, SC

ISLE OF PALMS, S.C. (WCSC) — A property owner on the Isle of Palms has appealed a judge’s order to remove a seawall he built, leading to new legal battles after years of controversy.

All parties involved filed appeals following a Dec. 30, 2025, decision by Judge Ralph King Anderson III ordering the removal of the man-made structure as it violates state coastal protection law.

The case has since been transferred to the Court of Appeals. Property owner Rom Reddy, the Coastal Conservation League, the South Carolina Environmental Law Project and the South Carolina Department of Environmental Services all submitted appeals.

Reddy also filed a motion to stay, which would allow the wall to remain in place until the Court of Appeals issues a final decision.

The seawall first sparked controversy in 2024 over erosion concerns and questions about how to properly protect homes while preserving the environment.

The original court order included a detailed timeline and corrective action requirements for removing the structure and restoring the beach. However, it declined to reinstate the $289,000 civil penalty originally assessed by the South Carolina Department of Environmental Services. Both the department and the law project are seeking that penalty in their appeals.

Lori Cary-Kothera, the chief conservation officer at the Coastal Conservation League, said in a statement that illegal seawalls offer an illusion of protection while guaranteeing long-term destruction.

“They harden one slice of shoreline at the cost of the living, dynamic beach system that actually provides natural storm protection,” Cary-Kothera said. “Enforcement of the beach regulations is critical.”

Reddy said he would not have needed to build the seawall if there had been more protection and restoration of the sand dunes when asked back in 2024.

“Our appeal is focused on ensuring that the full legal framework and evidentiary record supporting that outcome are accurately and completely addressed on review, including the Coastal Tidelands and Wetlands Act’s protections for natural beach dynamics and the enforcement authority the law provides, so that the full range of remedies necessary to protect South Carolina’s coast is preserved,” Leslie Lenhardt, the law project’s senior attorney, said.

Environmental advocacy groups say this type of seawall would only bring further erosion to beaches and go against state law. They said it also blocks public beach access.

ISLE OF PALMS — Although two Civil War-era shipwrecks that sit a mile off the coast of the barrier island aren’t a new discovery, they present another hurdle for the city as the start date for work on a large-scale renourishment project approaches.

It hasn't been smooth sailing for the Isle of Palms as the city prepares for the $32 million project.

City leaders are already facing a $10 million funding gap for the work, and they hope to avoid dipping into tourism accounts to fill it.

Project leaders with Coastal Science and Engineering, the city’s contracted firm leading the renourishment work, say they’re facing new challenges, too, with updated restrictions from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service around turtle and seabird nesting season that could impact when and where construction takes place.

On top of all that, the city’s coastal engineers in charge of the upcoming beach renourishment must maneuver around the wreckage sites to access the necessary 1.7 million cubic yards of sand offshore.

Shipwrecks the result of Union blockade

The wreckage is what remains of an attempt by Union powers to block Confederate ships from running the Charleston Harbor during the Civil War called the Stone Fleets.

In the early 1860s, Union forces bought dozens of former whaling and merchant ships, weighed them down with heavy stone and granite and scuttled them — sinking them intentionally in a checkerboard pattern.

James Spirek, an underwater archaeologist with the University of South Carolina’s Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology, surveyed the wreckage of the Stone Fleet in 2013.

“These obstructions were intended to frustrate the passage of blockade runners bringing war material and other sundry products from Europe and returning laden with cotton, rice and naval stores,” Spirek wrote in a 2013 survey report about the Stone Fleet.

The hope was that the scuttled ships would bolster the small number of vessels tasked with enforcing the blockade, according to reports from the Maritime Research Division at USC.

Thirteen of those vessels were sunk as part of the Second Stone Fleet, their masts stripped down and some set ablaze as they sank.

These ships were meant to block the entrance to the harbor and cut off access as ships tried to make their way through Maffitt’s Channel, the channel into the harbor near Sullivan’s Island.

The strategy was ultimately regarded as ineffective. Quick-shifting sands and strong tides destroyed many of the sunken ships.

“The ships broke apart and pieces washed ashore, a new channel supposedly scoured out, and blockade runners bypassed the obstructions with minimal diversion,” Spirek wrote in his 2013 survey report.

But some Confederate ships succumbed to the blockade and the Stone Fleet.

In 1863, a 205-foot-long Scottish-built ship called the Georgiana was spotted by the Union blockaders. The ship would have had to navigate the Second Stone Fleet while trying to quietly slip into the harbor unnoticed — an attempt that ended in Union gunfire.

The sinking of the Georgiana was reported as a “disaster” in the Charleston Mercury, the newspaper that wrote of the incident in 1863.

The captain ran the ship aground on the Isle of Palms, then called Long Island Beach, to evade capture, the paper reported. It was further destroyed by Union forces and stripped of its contents, which consisted of ammunition, rifles and battle axes.

About a year later, another blockade runner called the Mary Bowers hit the remains of the Georgiana. Sonar images show the ships are situated in the shape of an ‘X,’ with the Mary Bowers sitting on top of the Georgiana, roughly five feet below the surface at low tide.

Wreckage presents a new challenge

Today the two ships, along with remnants of the Second Stone Fleet, are also situated within an ideal borrow site for the island’s beach renourishment projects. Renourishment is completed with the use of long pipes, which take sediment from offshore and pump the material onto the beach.

The sand here is compatible with the Isle of Palms shores, and there’s plenty of it — enough to last 30 or 40 years, city council learned last summer.

The shipwrecks are valuable cultural resources and regarded as such by the State Historic Preservation Office. But their location—smack dab in the middle of a plethora of fresh sand for the deeply eroded island—means crews will need to work around them in order to dredge sand.

It’s an issue that engineers ran into while gearing up for the 2018 renourishment on the island. But additional research into the shipwrecks, and advancements of sonar imaging, have helped get a clearer picture of the wreckage.

These advances allow crews to get closer to the shipwrecks and retrieve the necessary 1.7 million cubic yards of sand offshore for the upcoming renourishment work.

“It's a cultural resource, and so we're working with (the State Historic Preservation Office) to avoid those areas. Previously ... that whole area was off limits,” Patrick Barrineau, a coastal science with CSE, told city council last summer. “It frees us up from a lot of previous restrictions that we've experienced off IOP.”

Project leaders anticipate work could start on June 1 or earlier, with construction ending in the winter.

In this timeframe, the city will more than likely have to juggle the beach-wide construction while managing peak tourist season — another hoop for the Isle of Palms to jump through as the island tries to recover from widespread erosion.

ISLE OF PALMS, S.C. (WCSC) — Isle of Palms is planning a beach renourishment project to fight worsening erosion, which is estimated to be more than $30 million.

City leaders say the plan is to dredge sand from offshore and pump it back onto the beach.

“We’ll go 3 to 4 miles offshore and pump sand back to the island,” Mayor Phillip Pounds said.

The city plans to place more than two million cubic yards of sand, focused on the Wild Dunes area and Breach Inlet.

In recent years, erosion has affected more than beachgoers. Residents say it’s threatening oceanfront homes.

“In this corner here, a breach inlet is, I think, seen at the worst, the erosion,” said John Chiappardi, a resident of Isle of Palms. “I’ve seen swimming pools go into the ocean. I mean, I think there’s lost eight pools or something to that effect.”

For now, sandbags have been used in emergencies, but officials say those have been taken over during high tides.

“Tides have come over the sandbags in some areas, particularly in the Wild Dunes area,” Pounds said.

The last beach renourishment project was in 2018 and helped with the problem temporarily.

“It lasted, you know, pretty good for six years. We had been planning to do it in 2028, but we moved it up two years,” Pounds said.

Some residents want a more permanent fix.

“It’s correcting the problem, but we don’t know if it’s temporary or permanently,” Chiappardi said.

But that is not up to the city, but instead the state’s legislature.

“You know, in South Carolina, you’re limited by what you can do on the beach, certainly the public beach,” Pounds said.

Hard erosion walls are one of the structures that could help the problem, but aren’t allowed.

This project is estimated to start around the summer of this year.

ISLE OF PALMS, S.C. (WCIV) — Efforts remain ongoing to fix heavy erosion issues that are causing concern on the Isle of Palms.

Despite not having a major weather event last year, the beachfront city still saw some damaging impacts. "We've had these king tides, we've had pretty significant northeast winds that drive the tides higher than what's stated, or what's expected," Mayor Phillip Pounds explained.

Current erosion conditions on the island's northern portion have lead to the city upping renourishment efforts by two years.

"We'll do this in 2026. Our hope is that it'll last at least 8 years," Pounds said.

The work, which if permits are in place in time, could start in the late spring, early summer. The project is estimated to cost the city around $25 million.

And that's not the only project impacting the island.

"The projects going on right now include permitting for a major beach renourishment project that includes placement of about 2 million cubic yards of sand on the north and south end of the island. Also, the Corps of Engineers is currently placing sand on the south end of the island as part of beneficial use projects," explained Steven Traynum, the president of Coastal Science and Engineering, a consultant being used by the city.

No matter where the erosion is on the island, fixing it is a big deal.

"So beach nourishment is incredibly needed right now at the city," Traynum continued. "The south end a couple of years ago had some uncharacteristic erosion that occurred. It was very traumatic."

The Army Corps of Engineers' work at Breach Inlet is a federal project that doesn't cost the city anything. However, to keep up with the Wild Dunes efforts and future renourishment projects, Mayor Pounds says IOP will need help.

He's been speaking with lawmakers about that potential funding.

According to Pounds, keeping the beach lifestyle in good health is key to the city's survival. "It's our engine. Economic engine for sure."

ISLE OF PALMS — A South Carolina judge has again directed two beachfront property homeowners to remove a seawall they constructed behind their house.

A month after S.C. Administrative Law Judge Ralph K. Anderson took back his decision ordering Rom and Renee Reddy to get rid of the ocean-facing seawall behind their Isle of Palms home, the judge has reverted to his original ruling.

Rom Reddy, who had the wall built in 2023, vows the fight is far from over.

This week, Anderson reversed his order from November after both Reddy and the Department of Environmental Services filed separate motions to reconsider the ruling. On Dec. 30, Anderson issued an amended order in the lengthy legal battle between the couple and the state.

In that order, the judge reaffirmed his original decision that the Reddys must tear down the erosion wall behind their house and restore the beach to its original condition.

The $289,000 worth of civil penalties levied by the state against the couple were also vacated. In his order, Anderson wrote that the homeowners were not “in direct violation of any permit” or had “violated a regulation, standard, or requirement” under the S.C. Coastal Zone Management Act when the state agency issued the fines in July 2024.

The judge did conclude DES does have the authority to order the removal of hard structures in the coastal zone “whether or not they are in the beaches critical area or landward of the setback line.”

He noted the wall had been built without any review by DES, and its installation had accelerated erosion of the beach.

He ordered Reddy to craft a plan to remove the wall and any non-beach compatible materials used for its construction within 60 days and submit the plan to the state’s environmental agency. Once DES approves that effort, the homeowners will have roughly four months to complete the work.

A DES spokesperson said the agency appreciates the removal timeline the judge laid out in his order.

In a written statement, Reddy said he plans to appeal the decision, saying he is displeased with the finding that DES can order removal of erosion control structures anywhere in the state’s coastal zone.

“Allowing an agency to have unilateral authority on private property is unconstitutional,” he said. “However, the administrative court is prevented by law from ruling on constitutional issues, which is a travesty.”

Reddy continued that given what he called the “constitutional issues at stake that will impact every property owner in this state, the Pacific Legal Foundation is joining this case on our behalf and will lead the appeals process.”

The Pacific Legal Foundation is a national public interest law firm. According to the foundation’s website, the law firm “defends Americans from government overreach and abuse.”

Leslie Lenhardt, an attorney with the South Carolina Environmental Law Project, said Anderson’s decision protects the public’s access to the beach.

“This order affirms that illegal seawalls disrupt natural beach dynamics and harm public access. The Court has protected the public interest in mapping out a clear timeline for Reddy's seawall removal,” Lenhardt said.